Published December 1, 1998
by CRC .
Written in English
|Contributions||Gary A. Olson (Editor), Thomas Moran (Editor)|
|The Physical Object|
|Number of Pages||114|
Introduction to This Special issue on Experimental Comparisons of Usability Evaluation Methods Article (PDF Available) in Human-Computer Interaction 13(3) September with 15 Reads Experimental comparisons of usability evaluation methods: special issue [Gary M. Olson, Thomas P. Moran] （Human-computer interaction, v. 13, no. 3） Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 「Experimental comparisons of usability evaluation methods: special issue」を図書館から検索。カーリルは複数の図書館からまとめて蔵書検索ができるサービスです。 カーリルは全国の図書館から本を検索できるサービスです A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods. In Human-Computer Interaction, 13 (3) pp. Harper, Richard, Rodden, Tom, Rogers, Yvonne and Sellen, Abigail (): Being Human: Human Computer Interaction in Microsoft Research Ltd /usability-evaluation.
Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability Through Product & Process (Wiley Professional Computing) by Deborah Hix, H. Rex Hartson(Contributor) (Paperback - April ) Average Customer Review: Usually ships in 24 hours Our Price: $ Experimental Comparisons of Usability Evaluation Methods: A Special Issue of Human-Computer Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theories, Methods, and Tools for Designing the User Experience Third International Conference, DUXU , Held as Part of HCI International , Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June , , Proceedings, Part I Over the past two decades, methods for the development, evaluation, and testing of survey questionnaires have undergone radical change. Research has now begun to identify the strengths and weaknesses of various testing and evaluation methods, as well as to estimate the methods Evaluation tests the usability, functionality and acceptability of an interactive system. Evaluation may take place: in the laboratory ; in the field. Some approaches are based on expert evaluation: analytic methods ; review methods ; model-based methods. Some approaches involve users: experimental methods ; observational methods
The design complexity of critical care ventilators (CCVs) can lead to use errors and patient harm. In this study, we present the results of a comparison of four CCVs from market leaders, using a rigorous methodology for the evaluation of use safety and user experience of medical devices. We carried out a comparative usability study of four CCVs: Hamilton G5, Puritan Bennett , Maquet SERVO-U Smith and Moser publish guidelines for “Designing User Interface Software.”. The Human Factor, by Harry Hersh and Dick Rubinstein, both at Digital Equipment Corporation, is is the first book-length description of human-computer interaction. J. Gould and Clayton Lewis publish the influential paper, “Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers :// For 11 studies, we find that the detection of usability problems as a function of number of users tested or heuristic evaluators employed is well modeled as a Poisson process. The model can be used to plan the amount of evaluation required to achieve desired levels of thoroughness or :// Analytical usability evaluation methods (UEMs) can complement empirical evaluation of systems: for example, they can often be used earlier in design and can provide accounts of why users might